April 2006, Issue No. 3

In this Issue:

  • Beat the "National Eating Disorder"

  • 15-Minutes to a "Hundred-Year Heart"

  • Attention Women: Good News from Research


Beat the "National Eating Disorder"

Americans jump from one diet trend to the next - whether it vilifies a nutrient category like fat or deifies a single food as the savior. But just where has obsession with healthy eating gotten us? Obesity has continued to rise now affecting one in five Americans. And incredibly, over 60% of American adults are now overweight.1

Somehow, what I call our "national eating disorder" has turned us into the fattest people in history. We’ve also seen an explosion of other diet-related problems. And, so many of my new patients just can't figure out why they’re so tired.

Americans want so badly to be healthy, but they're clearly missing out on something when it comes to what to eat.

NEW! - Dr. Sears on DVD
Secrets of an Ageless Heart


Filmed during the recent Ageless Heart Seminar, Dr. Sears reveals his secrets for a vigorous, youthful heart and powerful, robust lungs.

Forget one-hour workouts! Supercharge your heart in just 12 minutes. Hear Dr. Sears as he uncovers the winning strategies for reversing heart disease and avoiding heart attacks. For the first time, listen as he outlines PACE® - his patented fitness program. more...

How Did We Become Overfed Yet Undernourished?

Our tastes naturally guide us to food that’s good for us. Unless our ancestors were starving, they didn't eat grains because grains didn't taste good. Without processing, grains are hard, gritty, tasteless and difficult to digest. A natural balance ensued. The grains escaped mammalian predation and we stuck to foods we are adapted to eat.

With the advent of the milling of grains, cultures could feed more people. This allowed for both higher population densities and specialization. More people with specialized soldiers out-competed hunters even though grain fed peoples were smaller, weaker and more diseased than hunters. Civilization made a huge leap forward. But, we temporarily traded quantity for quality. Now in the modern world we have a choice.

Solve a Problem… Create a Problem

Fundamentally, the processing of grains created a problem. Many nutrients are different and nutritional deficiencies appear in the archeological record at the time we switched to grains. Yet the biggest problem with grains had not yet fully developed.

Grains pack in starch. Not a huge problem for a sustenance farmer spending 10 hours a day in the field. But with the industrialization of farming, high starch yields fuel another big problem. Starch triggers a rapid release of insulin in your blood. Insulin is your body’s principal way of directing calories into building fat.

Grains are also inflammatory wreaking all sorts of other damage, contributing to things like arthritis and Alzheimer's. Grain diets also cause a deficiency of fat. Studies of people eating low fat diets have found problems with calcium absorption, they've discovered low fat diets suppress the immune system, and they haven't found any evidence supporting the conventional advice that low fat diets improve your weight, your blood pressure, or your overall health.2




Reversing What the Diet Trends Got Wrong

A study reported in JAMA specifically compared the effects of a diet low in fat to a diet low in glycemic load. A diet low in glycemic load doesn't cut carbs down to nothing. It limits foods that have densely packed carbohydrates, foods like refined grains and potatoes. In other words, it cuts down on the starch.

The people on the low glycemic load diet lowered their triglycerides, blood pressure, and levels of C-reactive protein compared to the low-fat group.3 All of these are indicators of heart disease risk.

What's especially interesting to me about this is that eating low glycemic load foods is really simply your native diet. We evolved to eat like this. Whole, unprocessed foods. A good balance of meat, fish, vegetables, nuts and fruits.

In the recent low-carb trend, Americans got a little closer to the mark, but they still didn't hit it. Not all carbohydrates are equal. Vegetables are a great source of carbs. They're high in fiber, which slows the conversion of carbohydrates into glucose. That's important because it also slows your body's release of insulin. Fruits, nuts, and seeds are good as well. You can eat all these in their natural form and they are all good carbs.

Grains, potatoes, and corn can’t be eaten without processing or cooking and turn out to be problematic. They're higher in starch and create huge amounts of blood sugar eventually leading to insulin overproduction, which isn't good.

Lumping vegetables in with grains just because they’re both carbohydrates, ignores these critical differences and just doesn't make nutritional sense.

The Damage Done By Other Trends

We also narrow in on single foods, sometimes declaring the oddest things the path to true health. Take soy for example. Soy has been hailed as a preventer of heart disease and cancer, as a lowerer of cholesterol, and as an all around good thing to eat.

But it just ain't so.

Research links soy to decreased fertility, a higher risk of some cancers, and hormone imbalances. Still, the food industry grabbed hold of some promising study early on, some misleading tidbit of information, and created a booming market for soy. It's now in 70% of processed foods.4




Overcoming the Marketing of Obsession

The sudden changes in our food beliefs give food marketers a way to create endless variations on processed foods. Whatever the trend is, they can match it, whether it is low carb, low fat, or soy substitutes for real food.

It may be that Americans are so susceptible to food crazes because we don't have a stable culinary tradition to guide us. If you look at the French culture, they eat quite a number of high fat foods, but have lower heart disease rates than Americans. In a cross-cultural survey Americans were most likely to think about food in terms of health and least likely to think about it relating to pleasure.

Rebuilding Healthy Thinking about Food

Ask yourself, do you think more about good food to eat or more about what you are supposed to avoid? One perspective leads to fulfillment and satisfaction, making you likely to eat less. The other leads to guilt and regret and a propensity to eat more.

First, think about good food to eat:

  • Eat more protein. Eggs from free range chickens and grass-fed beef or bison are my favorites.
  • Eat more vegetables and fruits.
  • Eat more nuts and seeds.
  • Enjoy a bit of chocolate now and again. A glass of wine most days won't hurt either.

Next, how to eat:

  • Don’t skip breakfast.
  • Make dinner an event. Plan the meal. Invite the family. Set the mood. And enjoy each other's company as much as you enjoy the meal.
  • Chew. Slow down and savor the meal.
  • Pause. Set your fork down between bites.
  • Pay attention. When you feel comfortable and not hungry, decide to be done.
  • Think about your favorite foods. What are the things that make you really feel good when you're eating them? Don't deprive yourself of those foods. If they aren't healthy, just treat yourself occasionally.

Eating healthy is as simple as eating the foods you were built to eat. Having a healthy attitude toward food is as simple as enjoying the foods you eat, taking your time to taste them, and not worrying over the meal in front of you as you eat.

1. Overweightand Obesity: At a Glance, The Department of Health and Human Services. 3/15/2005

2. Sears, Al MD. Eat for Life.

3. Pereira, MA et al. Effects of a Low-Glycemic Load Diet on Resting Energy Expenditure and Heart Disease Risk Factors DuringWeight Loss, JAMA 2004; 292(20): 2482-90

4. The Truth About Soy, Dr Joseph Mercola's eHealthy News. (www.mercola.com) 12/4/2004



15-Minutes to a "Hundred-Year Heart"

NEW! - Dr. Sears on DVD
Advances in Rejuvenation


Filmed during the recent Ageless Heart Seminar, Dr. Sears brings to light the latest miracles of Anti-Aging Medicine.

In this sold-out presentation, Dr. Sears gives you practical ways to grow older while maintaining a youthful metabolism and capability. In a way that's easy to understand, Dr. Sears shows how each marker of aging can be measured and then reversed. Hear first-hand the tips and techniques you can easily apply to your own life. more...

Most experts break exercise into 2 categories: Resistance training and "cardio". I don’t practice either.

If you’ve been reading my writing, you know that after 20 years of working with athletes and patients, I’ve concluded that traditional "cardio" actually weakens your heart and drugs can’t possibly reverse the weakness.

Yet almost every day someone asks me, "Dr. Sears, I’m doing an hour of cardio three times a week… Why did my doctor tell me I need to take medications for my heart?"

Today I’ll show you how to avoid this dead-end trap. I’ll also clear up some of the confusion and get you started on my fast and easy system that actually works. It can keep your heart going strong for a hundred years or more.

Danger of Dropping Dead Due to Duration

Jack Kelly (brother of actress Grace Kelly) was well-conditioned for durational "cardio". One morning he went for his usual morning jog and suddenly dropped dead in his tracks of a heart attack. He was chairman of the U.S. Olympic Committee.

The next year at a long-distance race, I saw a man collapse to the ground clutching his chest right in front of our emergency aid station. His heart attack was so intense he couldn’t speak. I’ve never forgotten the panic in his eyes while I gave him oxygen.

We found another runner kneeling down on all fours waiting for us to help him. He had a dangerously irregular heartbeat that we usually see in older men with serious heart disease. But he was thin and young.

A few weeks ago, three guys had heart attacks while running the same Los Angeles marathon. Two of them died. This is disturbingly common.

The rate of sudden cardiac death for marathon runners is actually increased. If you’ve ever attended distance-running competitions, you may have noticed that these athletes have sunken chests. This turns out to be a critical clue to the adaptive response this exercise produces.

Why does this happen? Because running for miles – pushing for greater endurance – produces the opposite result of what you want to achieve. Instead of building heart strength, it shrinks your lungs and robs your heart of vital reserve capacity.




Intensity is the Key to Heart Healthy Exercise

Traditional "cardio" doesn’t save you from heart disease. Nature fashioned your heart to adapt to challenges. In doing so, your heart eliminates unused capacity. If you train your heart to adapt to longer intervals of "cardio," – like in a marathon, for example – you force your heart to sacrifice strength, power and reserve capacity.

And strength, power and reserve capacity are exactly what your heart needs most. These assets allow your heart to meet real world demands.

Conversely, high intensity exercise has been shown to help you live longer. A Harvard study compared vigorous and light exercise. Those who performed exercise that is more vigorous had a lower risk of death than those who performed less vigorous exercise.[1]

In your arms and legs, there’s only one way to build strength. And that’s to physically challenge their power. Your heart is the same. You need to challenge its power – not duration – to make it stronger.

We get a great source of data about heart health from the landmark Harvard Health Professionals Study of over 7,000 people. They found that the key to exercise is not length or endurance. It’s intensity. The more energy a person exerted, the lower their risk of heart disease.[2]

The best way to achieve high intensity workouts is to break the activity into short bursts. You can use any activity that will give your heart a bit of a challenge. My favorites are swimming, biking, running and elliptical machines.

I switch my patients among them to keep it fun and lower the chance of "overuse injuries." What you use will depend on your level of fitness. The most important strategy is to increase your challenge gradually over time.

 Protect Yourself from Heart Disease – In Just Minutes a Day

Over the past ten years, I developed a more effective heart-strengthening program. I call it PACE® for Progressively Accelerating Cardiopulmonary Exertion. It consistently produces dramatic results in my patients.

PACE® focuses on short bursts of exercise. I call them intervals. Break your exercise into short bouts then increase the intensity gradually as your conditioning improves. When you do this, it’s more enjoyable, more effective and safer than longer exercise at lower intensity.

Here’s a five-interval routine you can start right away:

Int 1

Rest

Int 2

Rest

Int 3

Rest

Int 4

 Rest

Int 5

Rest

2 min

2 min

90 sec

2 min

60 sec

2 min

40 sec

2 min

30 sec

2 min

Do the first interval at a low to moderate intensity. Then rest. But when you "rest," I don’t mean stop. Your rest interval should be a slow, easy pace – as if you’re walking.

On the second interval, boost the intensity. If you’re on a stationary bike, for example, you can turn up the resistance so it’s harder to pedal.

As the length of the interval goes down, the intensity should go up. By the time you do the thirty-second interval, you should give it everything you have.

If you haven’t exercised in a while, go slow at first. As you improve, give yourself an extra challenge each time you workout.



1. Lee I, et al. Exercise intensity and longevity in men. The Harvard Alumni Health Study. JAMA. 1995 Apr 19;273(15):1179-84.

2. Lee I, et al. Relative intensity of physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2003 Mar 4;107(8):1110-6.



Attention Women: Good News from Research

It’s been a good month for women. New studies are providing new opportunities for women who want better – and safer – choices to the health concerns that matter most.

Today, I’ll show you latest breakthrough ideas. You’ll find out how to prevent breast cancer and what to do if you have fibroids. I’ll also show you how to sidestep some bad advice coming from the big drug makers.

Better Than a Mammogram

Doctors in Boston recently introduced a new test for breast cancer. This simple urine test may offer a safe, non-invasive way to accurately assess a woman’s risk of breast cancer.

Dr. Pories of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston shared the results of her latest study at a recent breast cancer symposium. Her team found that urinary levels of two biomarkers (MMP-9 and ADAM12) are reliable predictors of increased risk of breast cancer.

In her study, she compared levels of these markers in both women with breast cancer and women without. 100% of the urine samples that tested positive for MMP-9 and ADAM12 belonged to women with breast cancer.

Women are Saying "No" to Drugs

A new unofficial poll suggests that women don’t want the toxic and potentially dangerous drug Tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer.

When given the option, most women choose safer, more natural ways to avoid breast cancer. Many were concerned about the drug’s side effects and the reliability of studies.

Most women preferred to make changes in their diet, exercise more and try alternative therapies.

Avoid Fibroid Surgery with New Technique

Surgery used to be the only option for uterine fibroids. Now a new procedure provides women with a non-invasive treatment.

Focused ultrasound is used together with an MRI to direct the beam. The availability of 3-D scanning allows the doctor to find the target with safety and precision.

The technique provides relief for one year and beyond, without serious side effects.

Doctor Sings Praises of Dangerous Drug

I recently came across an article written by a doctor endorsing the use of the anti-depressant Paroxetine in pregnant women. That’s not unusual. Doctors regularly prescribe anti-depressants during a woman’s first trimester.

But this particular doctor supported the use of the drug in spite of the FDA issuing a strong warning that Paroxetine can cause birth defects in newborns. "The benefits of using Paroxetine outweigh the risk to the unborn baby," he claimed.

Is it any wonder that this doctor is a paid consultant of GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Paroxetine?

Lifetime Exercise the Best Way to Beat Breast Cancer

New research shows that women who exercise throughout their lives have a 20% to 30% lower risk of breast cancer than women who don’t exercise.

The benefit holds true for all women, regardless of race or ethnicity. In the study, exercise was defined as three or more hours a week over a woman’s lifetime.

Dr. Bernstein speaking in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute said that her biggest challenge was motivating women to become physically active.

You can help prevent breast cancer and lose weight with my PACE® program – in just minutes a day. For more information, check out my website: www.AlSearsMD.com


DISCLAIMER: THE CONTENT AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-NEWSLETTER ARE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL ADVICE, AND WE DO NOT INTEND FOR THIS INFORMATION TO BE USED TO DIAGNOSE OR PRESCRIBE FORMS OF TREATMENT.
To unsubscribe from this newsletter, send a blank email with the word
"unsubscribe" as the subject line to unsubscribe@alsearsmd.com.